The Nonsense of Evolution

The Theory of Evolution = Hydrogen is a colourless, odourless gas which given enough time, turns into people!'

SHEER NONSENSE!!!

If YOU believe in evolution, try to answer the following questions honestly! WHICH evolved FIRST and how long did it work without the others...?

1. The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body's resistance to its own digestive juice (i.e. stomach, intestines etc.)
2. The 'drive' to reproduce or the ability to reproduce?
3. The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
4. How about this one... The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants? See how ridiculous evolution is!
5. Which evolved first, the bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones???
6. What about the nervous system, repair system, or hormone system, which evolved first???

How can LOVE, MERCY, GUILT 'evolve???' They CAN'T!!!

How can 'everything' come from NOTHING? It CAN'T!!!

Click here to read the Evolution Handbook

Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups! True science fiction!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is the evolutionary formula for making the universe...

When science talks about 'millions and billions of years' IT ISN'T science!!!

Every dating method used by evolutionists to get these huge eras of time is based on the assumption that the composition of the atmosphere and the rate of nuclear decay are 'constants' that never change. That is the basis for the Carbon 14 dating method and the Potassium-Argon dating method.

The older a thing in time, the MORE unreliable those methods are!

The reason for that is an event like the Flood which dramatically changed the atmosphere, which in turn allowed various solar rays to enter that had not been able to enter before. Exposure to these new radiations changed the rate of nuclear decay in the materials used in these dating methods. Also, the movement of large deposits of water changed the amount of the original material that would decay.

Scientists today assume an amount of original material based on the amount of decayed material and the present decay rate. It's the same kind of circular reasoning that geologists use to date rocks and fossils from the strata in which they are found. Using current sedimentation rates, they calculate how old a strata should be. Then they assign that age to every fossil found in that strata. So a fossil is assigned an age based on the strata, and wherever that type of fossil is found in the world, the strata of rock from which it was taken is assigned an 'abed' (adverb archaic 'in bed') based on the fossil!!! If the sediment was laid down within a year (Gen 7v13 compared to Gen 8v13) all over the earth at the same time, that would bring ages of sixty-five million to 4 billion years down to FIVE to TEN THOUSAND years!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What does the 'wonderful' teaching of Evolution tell us...

You are here by ACCIDENT!

You are heading NOWHERE!

You have NO PURPOSE!

What a privilege it is to be a monkey's uncle!!!

This world is still 'a vale of tears,' and science and education have done nothing - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - to convert it into anything else. The intellectual schmucks who talk about the 'advancements in medicine' and 'scientific technology' all forget to tell you that pain killers and hospital care and specialized treatment are luxuries that less than 2% of the world's population can afford! Neither science nor education has improved man's general lot more than by giving him a few pieces of junk to play with that he did not have in the 18^th Century!!!

Men don't believe evolution because it is scientifically accurate; they believe it because they don't want to give account to their Creator!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

'Science v Evolution!' The incredible BEE!!!

How about these for a few amazing facts about the common bee...

It has compound eyes able to analyse polarized light for navigation and flower recognition!

It has three additional eyes for navigation!

It has two antennae for smell and touch!

It has grooves on its front legs to 'clean' the antennae!

It has tube-proboscis to suck in nectar and water: when NOT in use, it curls back under its head!

It has two jars (mandibles) to hold, crush, and form wax!

It has a honey tank for temporary storage of nectar!

It has enzymes in its honey tank which will ultimately change the nectar into honey!

It has glands in the abdomen that produces beeswax, which is secreted as scales on the rear of its body!

It has five segmented legs which can turn in any needed direction!

It has pronged claws, on each foot, to cling to flowers!

It has glands in its head to make royal jelly!

It has glands in its body to make glue!

It has hairs on its head, thorax, and legs to collect pollen!

It has pollen 'baskets' on its rear legs to collect pollen!

It has several different structures to collect pollen!

It has spurs to pack it down!

It has a row of hooks on the trailing edges of its front wings, which, hooking to its rear wings in flight provides better flying power!

It has a barbed poison sting, to defend the bee and the hive!

It has an enormous library of inherited knowledge regarding how to grow up, make hives and cells, nurse infants, aid the queen bee; analyse, locate and impart information on how to find the flowers, navigate by polarized and other light, collect materials in the field, guard the hive, detect and overcome enemies plus a whole lot more!!!

A few questions...

How can a honeycomb have walls which are only 1/350^th inch think (0.007cm), yet are able to support 30 times their own weight?

How can a strong, healthy colony have 50,000 bees in, yet they are all able to work together with a great variety of tasks WITHOUT ANY instructors or supervisors?

How can a honeybee identify a flavour as sweet, sour, salty or bitter? How can it correctly identify a flower species and only visit that species on each trip into the field, while passing up tasty opportunities that it finds en route?

All these mysteries and more are found in the life of a common bee!

A honeybee averages 14 miles per hour in flight, yet collects enough nectar in its lifetime to make about 1/10^th of a pound (0.045kg) of honey! In order to make a pound of honey, a bee living close to clover fields would have to travel 13,000 miles!

With all its high-tech equipment, surely the bee would have taken millions of years to evolve EVERY PART OF IT? Yet, not long ago, a very ancient bee was found encased in amber. Analysing it, scientists decided that, although it dated back to the beginning of flowering plants, it was just like MODERN bees!!! So as far back in the past as we can go, we find that bees are just like bees TODAY!!!

Evolution is a faith which has no scientific evidence at all! Believe it at your peril!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First I was a fish swimming in the sea,

Then I was a frog with my tail between my knees,

I then became a monkey swinging in the trees,

And now I'm a Professor with a PhD.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The NONSENSE of Evolution

It takes a lot of FAITH to believe in Evolution! Imagine believing in the following, how absurd!

NOTHING produces EVERYTHING!

NON-Life produces LIFE!

Randomness produces Fine-Tuning!

Chaos produces Information!

Unconsciousness produces Consciousness!

NON-Reason produces Reason!

Only a monkey would 'believe' something so STUPID!!!

I suggest you watch the following debates...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Marvelous CHICKEN EGG - excerpted from The Evolution of a Creationist (Sent to me by Will Kinney)

[The Evolution of a Creationist] is a condensation and simplification of more than thirty years of studies that moved me from unquestioning belief in Darwinian evolution to undoubting trust in the special six-day creation by God as presented in the biblical account. It is my conviction that a simple discussion of the major questions in the creation/evolution controversy is needed for those men and women who have little or no background in science. Thus, I have attempted to address pertinent issues as simply as possible-fully recognizing that those who have studied intensively in specialized areas of science may accuse this book of being too simplistic. The book touches on the evolution of a creationist (me), but emphasizes the inherent conflicts between evolutionary theory and the Bible. This work is a compilation of thoughts and writings that God used to change my belief system, my worldview. - Jobe Martin.

A fertilized chicken egg is a very special creation. Before even thinking about a chick developing in an egg, it is interesting to ponder how the chicken manages to get a shell around that slippery, raw, fertilized egg. It is a rare sight on the farm to see raw egg smeared on the outside of the shell. Have you ever attempted to put an egg back into its shell after it rolled off the counter? The shell itself is highly specialized. Each chicken egg shell has about 10,000 tiny holes or pores. How does that chicken form a shell around a soft, messy egg and design the shell to have porosity? Put a raw egg in warm water and soon you will see tiny bubbles floating up. These bubbles are escaping through the pores in the shell. The developing chick needs these pores to breathe. Evolution basically says that when a need arises in an organism, mindless, random chance processes provide exactly, precisely and specifically what the organism needs to alter and improve it so that it will survive. How does a chicken know it needs to make a shell with porosity, and how would mindless evolution manufacture such a shell? The chick does not know it needs the holes in the shell to breathe until it dies for lack of air. Of course, dead chicks cannot evolve! Within the first few days after the egg is laid, blood vessels begin to grow out of the developing chick. Two of these attach to the membrane under the egg shell and two attach to the yolk. By the fifth day, the tiny heart is pumping blood through the vessels. What makes those blood vessels grow out of the chick, and how do they know where to go and to what to attach? The chick feeds from the yolk with the yolk vessels and breathes through the membrane vessels. If any of these vessels do not grow out of the chick or attach to the correct place, the chick will die. The chick gives off carbon dioxide and water vapor as it metabolizes the yolk. If it does not get rid of the carbon dioxide and water vapor, it will die of gaseous poisoning or drown in its own wastewater. These waste products are picked up by the blood vessels and leave through the pores in the eggshell. What evolutionary chance happening provided for all of these crucial advancements? By the nineteenth day, the chick is too big to get enough oxygen through the pores in the shell. It must do something or die. How does it know what to do next? By this time, a small tooth called the"egg-tooth" has grown onto its beak. It uses this little tooth to peck a hole into the air sack at the flat end of the egg. When you peel a hard-boiled egg you notice the thin membrane under the shell and the flattened end of the egg. This flattened end, which looks like the hen did not quite fill up her egg shell, is the air sack. The air sack provides only six hours of air for the chick to breathe. Instead of relaxing and breathing deeply, with this new-found supply of air, the chick keeps pecking until it breaks a small hole through the shell to gain access to outside air in adequate amounts. On the twenty-first day, the chick breaks out of the shell. If one step in the development of the chick is missing or out of order, the chick dies.* Timing is absolutely crucial! Each step in the development of the chick defies evolutionary logic. The process must be orchestrated by God, our Creator. The impersonal plus time plus chance is not an adequate explanation for the wondrous complexities of life as we observe it. There had to be a Designer and His name is the Lord Jesus Christ (John 1; Colossians 1; Hebrews 1). *Bob Devine, God In Creation (Chicago: Moody Press, 1982), pp. 9-13. This booklet discusses ten of God's creations and shows how they could not have evolved.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Evolution vs God

---

44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults - By Michael Snyder (Issue 78 page 56)

(I thought this was a good article!)

#1 If the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into another species. Instead, we have zero.

#2 When Charles Darwin came up with his theory, he admitted that no transitional forms had been found at that time, but he believed that huge numbers certainly existed and would eventually be discovered... "Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?"

#3 Even some of the most famous evolutionists in the world acknowledge the complete absence of transitional fossils in the fossil record. For example, Dr. Colin Patterson, former senior palaeontologist of the British Museum of Natural History and author of "Evolution" once wrote the following... "I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them .... I will lay it on the line - there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument."

#4 Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Palaeontology at Harvard University, once wrote the following about the lack of transitional forms... "The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."

#5 Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley of Johns Hopkins University has also commented on the stunning lack of transitional forms in the fossil record... "In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another."

#6 If "evolution" was happening right now, there would be millions of creatures out there with partially developed features and organs. But instead there are none.

#7 If the theory of evolution was true, we should not see a sudden explosion of fully formed complex life in the fossil record. Instead, that is precisely what we find.

#8 Palaeontologist Mark Czarnecki, an evolutionist, once commented on the fact that complex life appears very suddenly in the fossil record... "A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants - instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fuelled the creationist argument that each species was created by God."

#9 The sudden appearance of complex life in the fossil record is so undeniable that even Richard Dawkins has been forced to admit it... "It is as though they [fossils] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is divine creation and both reject this alternative."

#10 Nobody has ever observed macroevolution take place in the laboratory or in nature. In other words, nobody has ever observed one kind of creature turn into another kind of creature. The entire theory of evolution is based on blind faith.

#11 Evolutionist Jeffrey Schwartz, a professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh, openly admits that "the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed."

#12 Even evolutionist Stephen J. Gould of Harvard University has admitted that the record shows that species do not change. The following is how he put it during a lecture at Hobart and William Smith College... "Every palaeontologist knows that most species don't change. That's bothersome....brings terrible distress. ....They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they remain the same species and that's not due to imperfection and gaps but stasis. And yet this remarkable stasis has generally been ignored as no data. If they don't change, it's not evolution so you don't talk about it."

#13 Anyone that believes that the theory of evolution has "scientific origins" is fooling themselves. It is actually a deeply pagan religious philosophy that can be traced back for thousands of years.

#14 Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than 250,000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever. But instead, we find it in everything that we dig up - even dinosaur bones. This is clear evidence that the "millions of years" theory is simply a bunch of nonsense... It's long been known that radiocarbon (which should disappear in only a few tens of thousands of years at the most) keeps popping up reliably in samples (like coal, oil, gas, etc.) which are supposed to be 'millions of years' old. For instance, CMI has over the years commissioned and funded the radiocarbon testing of a number of wood samples from 'old' sites (e.g. with Jurassic fossils, inside Triassic sandstone, burnt by Tertiary basalt) and these were published (by then staff geologist Dr Andrew Snelling) in Creation magazine and Journal of Creation. In each case, with contamination eliminated, the result has been in the thousands of years, i.e. C-14 was present when it 'shouldn't have been'. These results encouraged the rest of the RATE team to investigate C-14 further, building on the literature reviews of creationist M.D. Dr Paul Giem.

In another very important paper presented at this year's ICC, scientists from the RATE group summarized the pertinent facts and presented further experimental data. The bottom line is that virtually all biological specimens, no matter how 'old' they are supposed to be, show measurable C-14 levels. This effectively limits the age of all buried biota to less than (at most) 250,000 years.

#15 The odds of even a single sell "assembling itself" by chance are so low that they aren't even worth talking about. The following is an excerpt from Jonathan Gray's book entitled "The Forbidden Secret"... Even the simplest cell you can conceive of would require no less than 100,000 DNA base pairs and a minimum of about 10,000 amino acids, to form the essential protein chain. Not to mention the other things that would also be necessary for the first cell.

Bear in mind that every single base pair in the DNA chain has to have the same molecular orientation ("left-hand" or "right hand")? As well as that, virtually all the amino acids must have the opposite orientation. And every one must be without error.

"Now," explained Larry, "to randomly obtain those correct orientations, do you know your chances? It would be 1 chance in 2110,000, or 1 chance in 1033,113!"

"To put it another way, if you attempted a trillion, trillion, trillion combinations every second for 15 billion years, the odds you would achieve all the correct orientations would still only be one chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion ... and the trillions would continue 2755 times!"

"It would be like winning more than 4700 state lotteries in a row with a single ticket purchased for each. In other words...impossible."

#16 How did life learn to reproduce itself? This is a question that evolutionists do not have an answer for.

#17 In 2007, fishermen caught a very rare creature known as a Coelacanth. Evolutionists originally told us that this "living fossil" had gone extinct 70 million years ago. It turns out that they were only off by 70 million years.

#18 According to evolutionists, the Ancient Greenling Damselfly last showed up in the fossil record about 300 million years ago. But it still exists today. So why hasn't it evolved at all over the time frame?

#19 Darwinists believe that the human brain developed without the assistance of any designer. This is so laughable it is amazing that there are any people out there that still believe this stuff. The truth is that the human brain is amazingly complex. The following is how a PBS documentary described the complexity of the human brain: "It contains over 100 billion cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells."

#20 The following is how one evolutionist pessimistically assessed the lack of evidence for the evolution of humanity... "Even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination."

#21 Perhaps the most famous fossil in the history of the theory of evolution, "Piltdown Man", turned out to be a giant hoax.

#22 If the neutron were not about 1.001 times the mass of the proton, all protons would have decayed into neutrons or all neutrons would have decayed into protons, and therefore life would not be possible. How can we account for this?

#23 If gravity was stronger or weaker by the slimmest of margins, then life sustaining stars like the sun could not exist. This would also make life impossible. How can we account for this?

#24 Why did evolutionist Dr. Lyall Watson make the following statement?... "The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!"

#25 Apes and humans are very different genetically. As DarwinConspiracy.com explains, "the human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the chimpanzee Y chromosome and the chromosome structures are not at all similar."

#26 How can we explain the creation of new information that is required for one animal to turn into another animal? No evolutionary process has ever been shown to be able to create new biological information. One scientist described the incredible amount of new information that would be required to transform microbes into men this way... "The key issue is the type of change required - to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content, from over half a million DNA 'letters' of even the 'simplest' self-reproducing organism to three billion 'letters' (stored in each human cell nucleus)."

#27 Evolutionists would have us believe that there are nice, neat fossil layers with older fossils being found in the deepest layers and newer fossils being found in the newest layers. This simply is not true at all... The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced ("younger" and "older" layers found in repeating sequences). "Out of place" fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

#28 Evolutionists believe that the ancestors of birds developed hollow bones over thousands of generations so that they would eventually be light enough to fly. This makes absolutely no sense and is beyond ridiculous.

#29 If dinosaurs really are tens of millions of years old, why have scientists found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them? The following is from an NBC News report about one of these discoveries... For more than a century, the study of dinosaurs has been limited to fossilized bones. Now, researchers have recovered 70 million-year-old soft tissue, including what may be blood vessels and cells, from a Tyrannosaurus rex.

#30 Which evolved first: blood, the heart, or the blood vessels for the blood to travel through?

#31 Which evolved first: the mouth, the stomach, the digestive fluids, or the ability to poop?

#32 Which evolved first: the windpipe, the lungs, or the ability of the body to use oxygen?

#33 Which evolved first: the bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or the muscles to move the bones?

#34 In order for blood to clot, more than 20 complex steps need to successfully be completed. How in the world did that process possibly evolve?

#35 DNA is so incredibly complex that it is absolutely absurd to suggest that such a language system could have "evolved" all by itself by accident... When it comes to storing massive amounts of information, nothing comes close to the efficiency of DNA. A single strand of DNA is thousands of times thinner than a strand of human hair. One pinhead of DNA could hold enough information to fill a stack of books stretching from the earth to the moon 500 times.

Although DNA is wound into tight coils, your cells can quickly access, copy, and translate the information stored in DNA. DNA even has a built-in proof-reader and spell-checker that ensure precise copying. Only about one mistake slips through for every 10 billion nucleotides that are copied.

#36 Can you solve the following riddle by Perry Marshall?...

1) DNA is not merely a molecule with a pattern; it is a code, a language, and an information storage mechanism.

2) All codes are created by a conscious mind; there is no natural process known to science that creates coded information.

3) Therefore DNA was designed by a mind.

If you can provide an empirical example of a code or language that occurs naturally, you've toppled my proof. All you need is one.

#37 Evolutionists simply cannot explain why our planet is so perfectly suited to support life.

#38 Shells from living snails have been "carbon dated" to be 27,000 years old.

#39 If humans have been around for so long, where are all of the bones and all of the graves? The following is an excerpt from an article by Don Batten... Evolutionists also claim there was a 'Stone Age' of about 100,000 years when between one million and 10 million people lived on Earth. Fossil evidence shows that people buried their dead, often with artefacts-cremation was not practised until relatively recent times (in evolutionary thinking). If there were just one million people alive during that time, with an average generation time of 25 years, they should have buried 4 billion bodies, and many artefacts. If there were 10 million people, it would mean 40 billion bodies buried in the earth. If the evolutionary timescale were correct, then we would expect the skeletons of the buried bodies to be largely still present after 100,000 years, because many ordinary bones claimed to be much older have been found. However, even if the bodies had disintegrated, lots of artefacts should still be found.

#40 Evolutionists claim that just because it looks like we were designed that does not mean that we actually were. They often speak of the "illusion of design", but that is kind of like saying that it is an "illusion" that a 747 airplane or an Apple iPhone were designed. And of course the human body is far more complex than a 747 or an iPhone.

#41 If you want to be part of the "scientific community" today, you must accept the theory of evolution no matter how absurd it may seem to you. Richard Lewontin of Harvard once made the following comment regarding this harsh reality... We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, . . . in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated commitment to materialism. . . . we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.

#42 Time Magazine once made the following statement about the lack of evidence for the theory of evolution... "Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn't fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate."

#43 Malcolm Muggeridge, the world famous journalist and philosopher, once made the following statement about the absurdity of the theory of evolution... "I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has."

#44 In order to believe the theory of evolution, you must have enough blind faith to believe that life just popped into existence from nonlife, and that such life just happened to have the ability to take in the nourishment it needed, to expel waste, and to reproduce itself, all the while having everything it needed to survive in the environment in which it suddenly found itself. Do you have that much blind faith?

For years, I have been looking for someone that can explain to me the very best evidence for the theory of evolution in a systematic way. My challenge has been for someone to lay out for me a basic outline of the facts that "prove" that evolution is true.

Perhaps you believe that you are up to the challenge?

My comment... Evolution is definitely the dumbest religion ever invented by mankind. It's not only dumb, but totally impossible! Evolution is indeed a fairy tale for grown-ups! If you believe it, you have been sucked in and deluded by the Devil, as the evidence for evolution is non-existent! May I suggest that you leave your pride behind, and do some proper research into this false religious claptrap!